The Supreme Court (SC) declared the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte unconstitutional, citing violations of the one-year bar rule and due process.
The ruling, with thirteen justices voting in favor, found that the impeachment complaint was transmitted to the Senate without the required plenary vote.
Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, who penned the decision, emphasized the importance of following correct legal procedures.
Despite the SC's decision, some legal analysts believe it could have far-reaching implications for the country's impeachment process.
Sens. Risa Hontiveros, Bam Aquino, and Kiko Pangilinan are urging the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision, stating it risks silencing the process that keeps power in check.
They argued that Congress followed the law in initiating and transmitting the complaint, and retroactively applying a new definition of "initiate" is unfair.
Former Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio also defended the House of Representatives, stating it followed the Constitution to the letter.
Topics in this story
Explore more stories about these topics.
🤖
This story was generated by AI to help you understand the key points. For more detailed coverage, please see the news articles from trusted media outlets below.
News Sources
See how different news organizations are covering this story. Below are the original articles from various Philippine news sources that contributed to this summary.







