Two administration lawmakers expressed reservations about House Bill (HB) No. 6616, also known as the Bayanihan Act of 2020, specifically regarding the duration and scope of the proposed emergency powers for President Duterte to address the COVID-19 crisis.
AKO-Bicol Party-List Rep. Alfredo Garbin Jr. and Cagayan de Oro 2nd district Rep. Rufus Rodriguez support the bill's passage as a means to combat the pandemic.
However, Garbin raised constitutional concerns, particularly about budget realignment and the potential takeover of private utilities, emphasizing that these actions must adhere to the Constitution.
Garbin also questioned the indefinite effectivity clause of the emergency powers and how congressional oversight could be exercised during such a period.
He specifically pointed to a constitutional provision suggesting that emergency powers granted to the President should automatically cease upon the next adjournment of Congress.
🤖
This story was generated by AI to help you understand the key points. For more detailed coverage, please see the news articles from trusted media outlets below.
News Sources
See how different news organizations are covering this story. Below are the original articles from various Philippine news sources that contributed to this summary.



